Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen 3 Max for coding
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger coder of the two on benchmarks, but Qwen 3 Max can be the better pick when cost, speed, or context window matter more. Below: a side-by-side spec table and exactly when to pick each.
At a glance
| Spec | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen 3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Oct 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76% | 68% |
| HumanEval | 95% | 92% |
| MMLU | 92% | 88% |
| Context window | 1M+ | 1M+ |
| Max output | 64K | 32K |
| Input price (per 1M) | $2 | $1.50 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $12 | $6 |
| Price tier | Premium | Mid |
| Speed | Medium | Medium |
| Hosting | Closed/API | Closed/API + Self-host |
| Modality | Multimodal (vision, audio, video) | Multimodal (vision) |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2026 | Sep 2025 |
Pick Gemini 3 Pro if…
- It scores higher on SWE-bench Verified (76% vs 68%), the best proxy for real-world coding.
- It's tuned for long-horizon agentic tasks, generative UI, multi-modal reasoning, Antigravity-driven workflows.
Pick Qwen 3 Max if…
- It's cheaper (Mid tier vs Premium).
- It's tuned for long-context coding, multilingual codebases, China-region deployments.
Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen 3 Max: which is better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger coder of the two on benchmarks, but Qwen 3 Max can be the better pick when cost, speed, or context window matter more. See the full spec table for SWE-bench, HumanEval, MMLU, context window, and pricing on both. Benchmarks are a directional signal, not a guarantee for your codebase — the most reliable test is running both on a real task you care about.
Compare these head-to-head with live data, or build a full stack around your pick — Flowpicker shows compatibility and monthly cost.
Open the live comparison →More comparisons
See the full model leaderboard ranked by SWE-bench, HumanEval, and MMLU.