Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 5 for coding
Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 5 are closely matched — the right choice comes down to price, context window, and how each behaves in your workflow. Below: a side-by-side spec table and exactly when to pick each.
At a glance
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Jan 2026 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72% | 72% |
| HumanEval | 94% | 94% |
| MMLU | 88% | 89% |
| Context window | 200K | 1M+ |
| Max output | 32K | 64K |
| Input price (per 1M) | $15 | $5 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $75 | $25 |
| Price tier | Premium | Premium |
| Speed | Slow/Reasoning | Medium |
| Hosting | Closed/API | Closed/API |
| Modality | Multimodal (vision) | Multimodal (vision) |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2026 | Dec 2025 |
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if…
- It's tuned for complex refactors, agentic coding, hard debugging, deep reasoning.
Pick Grok 5 if…
- It has a larger context window (1M+ vs 200K).
- It responds faster (Medium).
- It's tuned for real-time web/X context, long-context analysis, and agentic browsing.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 5: which is better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 5 are closely matched — the right choice comes down to price, context window, and how each behaves in your workflow. See the full spec table for SWE-bench, HumanEval, MMLU, context window, and pricing on both. Benchmarks are a directional signal, not a guarantee for your codebase — the most reliable test is running both on a real task you care about.
Compare these head-to-head with live data, or build a full stack around your pick — Flowpicker shows compatibility and monthly cost.
Open the live comparison →More comparisons
See the full model leaderboard ranked by SWE-bench, HumanEval, and MMLU.