HomeCompare › Deepseek alternatives

Deepseek alternatives

Looking for an alternative to Deepseek? Here are the 6 closest llm provider / model options for AI coding, each ranked by how well it replaces Deepseek — with the concrete reason to switch.

Quick comparison

ModelInput priceSWE-benchContext windowSpeed
Deepseek (you)$0.2742%128KStandard
DeepSeek V4 Flash$0.1448%1M+Fast
Mistral Large 3$0.5046%256KStandard
Codestral$0.2038%256KFast
Llama 4 MaverickFree (self-hosted)46%1M+Fast
Qwen 3 CoderFree (self-hosted)50%256KStandard
Grok 4-1 Fast$0.2034%2M+Fast

The best Deepseek alternatives

Ultra-cheap high-quality coding, bulk classification, context-heavy tasks

Why consider it instead:

  • Cheaper — $0.14/1M input vs $0.27, ~1.9× less
  • Higher SWE-bench (48% vs 42%)
  • Bigger context window (1M+)

Top open-weight multipurpose model, multilingual coding, self-hosting with frontier quality

Why consider it instead:

  • Higher SWE-bench (46% vs 42%)
  • Bigger context window (256K)

Specialized code completion and generation, FIM-aware coding, fast IDE completions

Why consider it instead:

  • Cheaper — $0.2/1M input vs $0.27, ~1.4× less
  • Bigger context window (256K)
  • Faster — better for autocomplete

Latest open-weights from Meta, large context, self-hosted coding with vision

Why consider it instead:

  • Cheaper — $0/1M input vs $0.27
  • Higher SWE-bench (46% vs 42%)
  • Bigger context window (1M+)

Open-source coding specialist, long-context code generation, FIM completions on local hardware

Why consider it instead:

  • Cheaper — $0/1M input vs $0.27
  • Higher SWE-bench (50% vs 42%)
  • Bigger context window (256K)

Ultra-cheap fast reasoning for bulk agentic coding and large context retrieval

Why consider it instead:

  • Cheaper — $0.2/1M input vs $0.27, ~1.4× less
  • Bigger context window (2M+)
  • Faster — better for autocomplete

Switching from Deepseek? Check the new tool fits the rest of your stack — Flowpicker shows compatibility warnings live.

Open the stack planner →